ARCOM

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 10 results ...

Fahmy, A, Hassan, T, Bassioni, H and McCaffer, R (2019) Dynamic scheduling model for the construction industry. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 10(03), 313–30.

Geekiyanage, D and Ramachandra, T (2020) Nexus between running costs and building characteristics of commercial buildings: hedonic regression modelling. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 10(03), 389–406.

Ling, F Y, Zhang, Z and Wong, W T (2020) How personality traits influence management styles of construction project managers. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 10(03), 453–68.

Mathar, H, Assaf, S, Hassanain, M A, Abdallah, A and Sayed, A M (2020) Critical success factors for large building construction projects. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 10(03), 349–67.

• Type: Journal Article
• Keywords: Construction; Competency; Saudi Arabia; Project performance; Communication; Project manager;
• ISBN/ISSN: 2044-124X
• URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-07-2019-0057
• Abstract:
  The literature revealed a limited number of studies on critical success factors (CSFs) in Saudi Arabia. These studies were either outdated, covered limited factors or focused on very specific issues of a project. In response to this knowledge gap, the purpose of this paper is to identify and assess the factors which affect the success of construction projects in Saudi Arabia. In all, 91 CSFs were identified from the literature, and grouped under eight categories according to categorization schemes adopted by earlier studies and common characteristics shared by the factors. A questionnaire survey was adopted since it permits the collection of large volumes of data in a short period. In total, 61 responses from industry experts were used to compute the significance index for each factor and rank the most CSFs. Contractors viewed the three most significant CSFs as “competency and capability of the contractors’ key personnel in different disciplines,” “adequacy of labor resources and their skills” and “the impact of the project on the public.” Consultants viewed the three most significant CSFs as “competency and capability of the consultants’ key personnel in different disciplines,” “clear communication channels between the owner/PM and the designer” and “PM competency, authority and involvement.” Although a significant number of studies have investigated CSFs for construction projects, these studies do not provide an extensive list of CSFs, and none have studied CSFs in large-scale construction projects in Saudi Arabia from the viewpoint of two key stakeholders. This study attempts to address this knowledge gap.

Mwesigwa, R, Nabwami, R, Mayengo, J and Basulira, G (2020) Contractual completeness as a cornerstone to stakeholder management in public private partnership projects in Uganda. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 10(03), 469–84.

Shojaei, P and bolvardizadeh, A (2020) Rough MCDM model for green supplier selection in Iran: a case of university construction project. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 10(03), 437–52.

Shooshtarian, S, Lingard, H and Wong, P S (2020) Using the cost of construction work to trigger legislative duties for WHS: the Australian experience. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 10(03), 369–87.

Vilventhan, A and Rajadurai, R (2019) 4D Bridge Information Modelling for management of bridge projects: a case study from India. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 10(03), 423–35.

Wuni, I Y and Shen, G Q (2020) Stakeholder management in prefabricated prefinished volumetric construction projects: benchmarking the key result areas. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 10(03), 407–21.

Yap, J B H and Chow, I N (2020) Investigating the managerial ‘‘nuts and bolts’’ for the construction industry. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 10(03), 331–48.